Economic Assessment of Poverty Nodes and Nodal Economic Profiles

Description

In 2001 government indicated that direct action was required to
overcome these conditions. The Urban Renewal and Integrated Sustainable Rural Development Programmes were launched to address underdevelopment in the Presidential poverty nodes (see www.dplg.gov.za for more information on these programmes). The intention was for government to intervene in the Presidential poverty nodes through a process of intergovernmental cooperation
that would be fostered by an integrated approach to policy and planning. Following a review of these programmes in 2005, the Department of Provincial and Local Government established a Programme of Action “for building productive and sustainable nodal economies”, to accelerate the development of the areas defined as Presidential poverty nodes. It concluded that the essential economic development problem in the nodes is that, notwithstanding considerable effort, the urban and rural development programmes are not generating sufficient economic activity to underpin sustained development. The review suggested that the economic development problem is made up of six components.

Information

Evaluation Number:
204
Score:
3,8
Report Approval:
Saturday, 15 December 2007
Published:
Monday, 01 January 2007
Initiated By:
Business Trust, Office of the Presidency, Department of Provincial and Local Government
Undertaken By:
Rhizome Management Services with the Monitor Group
Evaluation Period:
2007
Evaluation Area:
Economic planning and development
LED, SMEs & local development projects
National Outcome:
National Outcome 4: Decent employment through inclusive economic growth.
National Outcome 7: Vibrant, equitable and sustainable rural communities with food security for all.
Commissioned By:
Evaluation Type:
Economic
Evaluation Subject:
Programme
Geographic Scope:
National

Evaluation Documents

File Name
204 EQAT 20130322 tm_mb.pdf
Expanding economic opportunity in the Presidential poverty nodes.pdf 204.pdf

Similar Evaluations

An Evaluation of the Comprehensive Agricultural Support Programme (CASP)

An impact evaluation of the Comprehensive Agricultural Support Programme (CASP) was commissioned by the Department of Performance Monitoring and Evaluation (DPME) in partnership with the Department...
Evaluation Number:
405
Report Approval:
Thursday, 01 September 2011
Published:
Tuesday, 17 September 2013
Initiated By:
Public Service Commission

Evaluation of Budget Support in South Africa

This is an exceptionally good quality evaluation, scoring 4.02 using the assessment tool. In terms of the phases of the evaluation, the planning and design of the project was particularly strong...
Evaluation Number:
418
Report Approval:
Monday, 30 September 2013
Published:
Tuesday, 04 February 2014
Initiated By:
European Commission

Implementation and Impact Evaluation of the Technology and Human Resources for Industry Programme (THRIP)

The Technology and Human Resources for Industry Programme (THRIP) is a research and development programme established during 1992 with the objective of accelerating economic growth, creating wealth...
Evaluation Number:
502
Report Approval:
Monday, 16 March 2015
Published:
Monday, 16 May 2016
Initiated By:
Department of Trade and Industry and the Department of Performance Monitoring and Evaluation in the Presidency

Review of the Expanded Public Works Programme in Gauteng, 2009 – 2014

This evaluation was commissioned by the Gauteng provincial government as part of its overall midterm review process. The aim of this evaluation is to provide an overview and assessment of the impact...
Evaluation Number:
442
Report Approval:
Tuesday, 14 May 2013
Published:
Tuesday, 17 May 2016
Initiated By:
Gauteng Province

Report on the Evaluation of Government's Poverty Reduction Programme

The commitment by the South African government to poverty reduction has been expressed in recent years through various national, provincial and local policy interventions. As such, since 1994, the...
Evaluation Number:
75
Report Approval:
Monday, 01 October 2007
Published:
Wednesday, 18 May 2016
Initiated By:
Public Service Commission