Documenting Lessons and Outcomes of the Business Enabling Fund (BEF) of the Gijima KwaZulu-Natal Local Economic Development Support Programme

Description

The purpose of the evaluation as set out in the Evaluation Terms of Reference and, as a product of subsequent engagement with the client and the Programme Steering Committee (PSC), refined and
confirmed in the evaluation’s Inception Report, is to establish the outcomes attained by the BEF, and document the lessons learned through its implementation. The evaluation is therefore required to
both pronounce on the overall performance of the Fund, as well as find evidence of ‘what works’ and ‘what does not work’ in order to inform the design of future funding instruments.
Final report: Documenting key lessons and outcomes of the BEF
17 INTRODUCTION
This report is further intended to inform programme management’s end-term reporting to the EU on the EU-Gijima KZN LED Support Programme, fulfilling its contracted evaluation and accountability
obligations; and it is anticipated that the evaluation will contribute to the body of knowledge on LED practice in South Africa more generally. The evaluation terms of reference operationalises the evaluation purpose in four broad study objectives, namely:
STUDY OBJECTIVE 1: Determine the nature and extent to which BEF projects have contributed towards fund, programme and broader LED outcomes in their respective localities, paying specific
attention to how and whether the BEF projects have any relevance or have rendered any results in terms of locality and local government LED processes.
STUDY OBJECTIVE 2: Determine the nature and extent to which the BEF has contributed to the establishment and operation of an enabling environment for business in a locality.
STUDY OBJECTIVE 3: Identify weaknesses relating to the BEF design and objectives, grant eligibility, approval or implementation and how existing weaknesses may be mitigated or eliminated.
STUDY OBJECTIVE 4: Propose amendments to the Business Enabling Fund model or alternative models or instruments for support to the government sector in the effective development and
operation of an enabling environment for business.
Study objectives 1 and 2 are concerned with the outcomes and impact of the BEF and direct the evaluation towards identifying the BEF’s contribution to LED at project, programmatic and systems
levels; while study objectives 3 and 4 direct the evaluation towards assessing and explaining the level of efficacy demonstrated by the BEF model.

Information

Evaluation Number:
92
Score:
4.0
Report Approval:
01 June 2011
Published:
06 February 2013
Initiated By:
KwaZulu-Natal Department of Economic Development and Tourism
Undertaken By:
Feedback Research and Analytics
Evaluation Period:
May 2011- June 2011
Evaluation Area:
Economic planning and development
National Outcome:
National Outcome 4: Decent employment through inclusive economic growth.
Commissioned By:
Evaluation Type:
Implementation
Impact
Evaluation Subject:
Programme
Geographic Scope:
Provincial

Evaluation Documents

File Name
92 EQAT 20130319 rr_mb.pdf
Feedback_BEF Evaluation_Final Report September 2011.pdf 92.pdf

Similar Evaluations

Evaluation of the Community Development Worker Programme

The overall aim of this project was to research, evaluate and document the process of implementing the CDW programme across national, provincial and local governments by applying, inter alia, a...
Evaluation Number:
33
Report Approval:
27 June 2005
Published:
25 February 2013
Initiated By:
South African Management Development Insititute (SAMDI)

Evaluation of Budget Support in South Africa

This is an exceptionally good quality evaluation, scoring 4.02 using the assessment tool. In terms of the phases of the evaluation, the planning and design of the project was particularly strong...
Evaluation Number:
418
Report Approval:
30 September 2013
Published:
04 February 2014
Initiated By:
European Commission

Implementation and Impact Evaluation of the Technology and Human Resources for Industry Programme (THRIP)

The Technology and Human Resources for Industry Programme (THRIP) is a research and development programme established during 1992 with the objective of accelerating economic growth, creating wealth...
Evaluation Number:
502
Report Approval:
16 March 2015
Published:
16 May 2016
Initiated By:
Department of Trade and Industry and the Department of Performance Monitoring and Evaluation in the Presidency

Review of the Expanded Public Works Programme in Gauteng, 2009 – 2014

This evaluation was commissioned by the Gauteng provincial government as part of its overall midterm review process. The aim of this evaluation is to provide an overview and assessment of the impact...
Evaluation Number:
442
Report Approval:
14 May 2013
Published:
17 May 2016
Initiated By:
Gauteng Province

RED Door Impact Study: Phase Two

The purpose of the evaluation was to gather the views of Red Door Clients to determine the impact of the service.
Evaluation Number:
108
Report Approval:
01 September 2008
Published:
01 June 2016
Initiated By:
Western Cape Provincial Government - Department of Economic Development and Tourism