The State of Literacy Teaching and Learning in the Foundation Phase: National Report 2012

Description

This evaluation received an overall score of 3.82. Follow up, use and learning phase received the highest score (4.29), and other phases scored between “satisfactory” and “good”. In terms of overarching considerations, Co-ordination and alignment received a score of 4.87, while capacity development and partnership approach scored lowest (2.92 and 2.94 respectively).

The lack of participation of the Department of Basic Education (DBE) in the evaluation process was a decision taken by the Department to encourage the autonomy of the evaluator, and ensure the credibility
of evaluation findings. Despite the lack of involvement by the DBE the utilisation of evaluation findings have been a key strength of this evaluation. Some questions were however raised regarding the
appropriateness of the research design, and this may have been avoided had consultation taken place.

Of all the evaluation phases, the planning and implementation phases received the lowest scores (each 3.69). This was mainly due to the lack of participation (partnership approach) and capacity development of the DBE. This needs to be understood within the context that the nature of the participation was determined by the Department as indicated above. The reporting phase received a score of 3.76. The evaluation report was well written on the whole as the content was accessible and conclusions were well constructed. The structure of the initial sections in the report (introduction, methods, sample, etc.) could have been more logical and comprehensive.

Information relating to the research design, sampling methodology, data analysis methods, limitations and ethics were omitted and this weakened the report. Using a more sophisticated software package
would also have strengthened and deepened the data analysis and improved the robustness of the findings. Co-ordination and alignment received a high score of 4.87 due to content and processes being well aligned to legislation, policy and literature.

Information

Evaluation Number:
401
Score:
3.8
Report Approval:
02 May 2013
Published:
06 December 2013
Initiated By:
Department of Education
Undertaken By:
National Education Evaluation and Development Unit
Evaluation Period:
May 2012 to 2 May 2013 (1 year)
Evaluation Area:
Education
National Outcome:
National Outcome 1: Improved quality of basic education.
Commissioned By:
National
Evaluation Type:
Diagnostic
Implementation
Evaluation Subject:
Sector
Geographic Scope:
National
Provincial
District
Local

Evaluation Documents

File Name
The State of Literacy Teaching and Learning in the Foundation Phase.pdf
State of Literacy 2012 NEEDU national report_final.pdf

Similar Evaluations

Basic Education Macro Indicator Report

At the outset it must be pointed out that this Macro Indicator Report for the Department of Basic Education was not intended to be an evaluation. There have been previous iterations of this report...
Evaluation Number:
422
Report Approval:
31 October 2013
Published:
03 February 2014
Initiated By:
Department of Basic Education

Diagnostic/Implementation Evaluation of Nutrition Interventions for Children from Conception to Age 5

Overall, this evaluation of nutrition interventions scored a good 3.68 out of 5. It was well conceived but was hampered by a budget and time allocations that proved to be hopelessly inadequate, thus...
Evaluation Number:
441
Report Approval:
31 October 2014
Published:
01 March 2014
Initiated By:
Department of Health

Formative Evaluation of Textbooks and Workbooks

Textbooks and workbooks have long been considered a critical challenge within the South African education system. The Textbook Development Institute notes that: Concern about the quality and...
Evaluation Number:
421
Report Approval:
28 February 2013
Published:
19 May 2016
Initiated By:
The Department of Basic Education

Diagnostic evaluation of the Military Veterans' Economic Empowerment and Skills Transferability Programme

This diagnostic evaluation sought to understand the status of Military Veterans (MVs) and to document in more detail their existing education, skills, experience as well as their employment status...
Evaluation Number:
512
Report Approval:
01 May 2015
Published:
29 September 2016
Initiated By:
DPME and Department of Military Veterans

Implementation Evaluation of the Funza Lushaka Bursary Programme

This is an implementation evaluation of the Funza Lushaka Bursary Programme (FLBP), established in 2007 with the goal of attracting greater numbers of students into initial teacher education (ITE)...
Evaluation Number:
514
Report Approval:
31 March 2016
Published:
06 April 2017
Initiated By:
Department of Basic Education and Department of Planning, Monitoring & Evaluation